Moodle proctoring plugins fall into four groups: native AI plugins (ProctorLink), the free open-source image-capture plugin (quizaccess_proctoring), lockdown browsers (Safe Exam Browser), and lockdown-plus-cloud or extension proctors (Respondus Monitor, Proctorio). They differ most on integration model, detection depth, review workflow, and where student data is stored. For high-stakes exams that stay inside Moodle and keep evidence on your own servers, a native AI plugin such as ProctorLink is the closest fit.
Schedule a DemoFeature lists on vendor pages are long, but a Moodle proctoring comparison really comes down to six dimensions. Score each candidate on these and the differences that matter become clear quickly.
This guide compares named options against those dimensions. If you are still defining what “best” means for your institution, start with Best Moodle proctoring plugin, then use the tables below to place specific plugins.
These are the options most Moodle teams encounter, grouped by how each one connects, what it detects, and where the data lives. Capabilities change between releases, so confirm the current details with each vendor before you shortlist.
| Plugin / tool | Type | Integration | Detection | Data storage | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ProctorLink | Commercial plugin | Native quiz-access plugin. Proctoring is a per-quiz toggle; students stay in Moodle. | AI events: multiple faces, absence from camera, tab switching, ambient audio. | On-premise option. Flagged stills and logs on your own Moodle infrastructure. | High-stakes and large exams that need AI review and data control at scale. |
| Proctoring (quizaccess_proctoring) | Open-source community plugin | Native quiz-access plugin. Captures images inside the Moodle attempt. | Interval webcam image capture. No automated analysis out of the box. | Images stored in your Moodle database. | Low-stakes class quizzes that need a basic photographic record at no licence cost. |
| Safe Exam Browser (quizaccess_seb) | Open-source lockdown | Native quiz-access rule. Requires the SEB client before the attempt starts. | Device lockdown only. No camera or microphone monitoring. | No media captured; configuration and logs stay in Moodle. | Securing the device against tabs, copy-paste, and other apps, usually alongside a proctor. |
| Respondus Monitor + LockDown Browser | Commercial lockdown + cloud | Separate LockDown Browser client plus a cloud service; configured per quiz. | AI-assisted webcam recording reviewed in the vendor dashboard. | Session recordings in vendor cloud storage. | Institutions already standardised on LockDown Browser for all attempts. |
| Proctorio | Commercial browser extension | Browser extension linked to Moodle via LTI or a deep link. | AI events with configurable webcam, screen, and behaviour recording. | Vendor cloud storage with export access. | Mixed-LMS estates that want one extension across several platforms. |
The open-source plugin and Safe Exam Browser are both worth knowing well. The community proctoring plugin gives you free image capture, and Safe Exam Browser secures the device. Neither analyses behaviour on its own, which is where the commercial AI options differ. For how that automated analysis works, see What is AI proctoring?
The four categories behave differently on the dimensions that decide day-to-day cost and compliance. Read across each row to see how a native AI plugin, the free image-capture plugin, a lockdown-plus-cloud stack, and an extension proctor compare.
| Feature | Native AI plugin (ProctorLink) | Open-source plugin | Lockdown + cloud | Browser extension |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integration model | Native Moodle quiz-access plugin | Native Moodle quiz-access plugin | Client + cloud service | Browser extension via LTI |
| Student stays in Moodle | Yes | Yes | Launches a separate browser client | Extension overlay; may leave Moodle for LTI |
| Software students must install | None. Runs in the browser | None. Runs in the browser | LockDown Browser download | Browser extension install |
| AI event detection | Faces, absence, tab switch, audio | None. Image capture only | AI-assisted recording review | Configurable AI events |
| Reviewer workflow | Flagged-event timeline; judge suspicious moments only | Human scans captured images | Priority-ranked recordings in vendor dashboard | Flagged recordings in vendor dashboard |
| Data residency | On-premise on your Moodle server | Your Moodle database | Vendor cloud | Vendor cloud |
| Licence model | Subscription or credit packs | Free and open source | Institutional licence | Institutional licence |
| Proven high concurrency | 2,000+ concurrent (SPPU entrance grid) | Depends on your Moodle hosting | Vendor cloud scales; verify at your peak | Vendor cloud scales; verify at your peak |
There is no single winner. The right plugin depends on exam stakes, cohort size, and your data rules. Use this quick guide to match a scenario to a category, then pilot the finalists.
| Your situation | Where to start |
|---|---|
| Occasional low-stakes class quizzes, tight budget | Open-source proctoring plugin for basic image capture inside Moodle. |
| You only need to lock the device, not watch the room | Safe Exam Browser, usually added on top of a proctoring plugin. |
| High-stakes or large exams, native Moodle, data control | ProctorLink for AI event review, flagged timelines, and on-premise storage. |
| Several LMSs beyond Moodle in one procurement | An extension-based proctor via LTI, accepting vendor-cloud storage. |
Many institutions combine categories: a lockdown browser to secure the device plus a proctoring plugin to watch the candidate. For the settings that reduce cheating before any plugin is added, see How to prevent cheating in Moodle exams, and for how automated and human oversight differ, see AI proctoring vs live proctoring.
ProctorLink is built as a native Moodle proctoring plugin rather than a separate portal or extension. In comparison terms that puts it in the native-AI column: proctoring toggles on inside the standard quiz settings, students never leave the LMS, AI flags integrity events during the attempt, and reviewers work from a flagged-event timeline instead of raw video.
Published figures from ProctorLink Moodle deployments:
Across published deployments, ProctorLink has supported more than one million proctored exam sessions (methodology note below). More detail lives on the case studies page.
Institutions evaluating proctoring tools often look for independent feedback outside vendor case studies. ProctorLink is listed on G2, where Moodle administrators and training teams share verified product reviews.
Read ProctorLink reviews on G2 →Deployment statistics and product behaviour described in this guide link to the sources below.
Comparing Moodle proctoring plugins? See how a native AI plugin installs, what it costs, and where it is already running.
See per-quiz proctoring inside your own Moodle in a 30-minute walkthrough.
Subscription tiers for steady exam cycles and credit packs for seasonal peaks.
Install guide, plugin download from moodle.org, and compatibility notes.
How to define shortlisting criteria before you compare specific plugins.
SPPU, RT-MSSU, and Ashoka University: integrity at university scale.
The quiz settings that cut cheating before any plugin is added.
Online proctoring supervises remote exams via webcam and microphone inside your LMS, logging rule violations with timestamps so reviewers judge flagged cases, not every session.
AI proctoring uses machine learning to automatically detect suspicious exam behaviour such as multiple faces, tab switching, and absence from the camera.
A comparison of leading Moodle proctoring plugins for universities that need native LMS integration, AI monitoring, and institution-owned data.
How university exam offices choose online proctoring software for entrance grids, finals, and multi-faculty calendars, including stakeholder RFPs and centre-vs-online cost tradeoffs.
How certification bodies and training providers use online proctoring for identity proofing, item-bank protection, and defensible, audit-ready credentialing exams.
A side-by-side comparison of AI proctoring and live human proctoring for cost, scale, accuracy, and exam security.
Practical steps to reduce cheating in Moodle quizzes using proctoring settings, question banks, timing controls, and AI monitoring.
A guide to online exam proctoring for Indian universities and certification providers, including compliance, pricing in INR, and local case studies.
The fastest way to settle a plugin comparison is a pilot. ProctorLink installs as a native Moodle plugin, flags integrity events for fast review, and keeps evidence on your server. Run it on a real quiz and time the reviewer workload.